summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLoic Guegan <manzerberdes@gmx.com>2019-05-23 14:17:45 +0200
committerLoic Guegan <manzerberdes@gmx.com>2019-05-23 14:17:45 +0200
commit2b31f7dbfd9a019636cbf23ac1535e2e627c06d6 (patch)
tree1d26aeefd008651ec4ea51b85453afc13d470762
parent1793b18aeb1a2c8b70e46a6e93527b904384e79b (diff)
Update paper
-rw-r--r--2019-Mascots.org5
-rw-r--r--2019-Mascots.pdfbin110611 -> 110742 bytes
2 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/2019-Mascots.org b/2019-Mascots.org
index 26f3085..c1d80eb 100644
--- a/2019-Mascots.org
+++ b/2019-Mascots.org
@@ -148,7 +148,6 @@ component, formatting, style, styling, insert
\end{figure}
#+END_EXPORT
-
The number of sensors is the dominant factor that leverage the energy consumption of the
IoT/Network part. Therefore, we varied the number of sensors in the Wifi cell to analyze its
impact. The figure \ref{fig:sensorsNumber} represents the energy consumption of each simulated
@@ -171,7 +170,9 @@ component, formatting, style, styling, insert
in how case, application accuracy is driven by the sensing frequency and thus the transmit
frequency of the sensors. In this way, we vary the transmission frequency of the sensors from 1s
to 60s. Figure \ref{fig:frequency} present the effects of the sensors transmission frequency on
- the IoT/Network part energy consumption. In case of
+ the IoT/Network part energy consumption. In case of small and sporadic network traffic, these
+ results show that with a reasonable transmission frequency the energy consumption of the
+ IoT/Network if almost not affected by the variation of this frequency.
#+BEGIN_EXPORT latex
\begin{figure}
diff --git a/2019-Mascots.pdf b/2019-Mascots.pdf
index f02c423..d6c58fd 100644
--- a/2019-Mascots.pdf
+++ b/2019-Mascots.pdf
Binary files differ