summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/2019-ICA3PP.org
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLoic Guegan <manzerbredes@mailbox.org>2019-07-19 10:19:21 +0200
committerLoic Guegan <manzerbredes@mailbox.org>2019-07-19 10:19:21 +0200
commit8291ba58641595f2ed132003b65b00e57aba198f (patch)
tree04efb8ca7440d4703cf180a2e0e97f79c19d61a8 /2019-ICA3PP.org
parent23a92c716b87e61cbf66943ee8a29dadb5c28fa1 (diff)
Run experiment again to correct ns-3 application delay
Diffstat (limited to '2019-ICA3PP.org')
-rw-r--r--2019-ICA3PP.org34
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/2019-ICA3PP.org b/2019-ICA3PP.org
index 4bfdf5d..e92e43c 100644
--- a/2019-ICA3PP.org
+++ b/2019-ICA3PP.org
@@ -413,15 +413,15 @@ part and the cloud part, as displayed on Figure \ref{fig:parts}.
In this section, we analyze the experimental results.
** IoT and Network Power Consumption
- In a first place, we start by studying the impact of the sensors'
- transmission frequency on their energy
- consumption. To this end, we run several simulations in ns3 with 15 sensors using different transmission frequencies. The
- results provided by Table \ref{tab:sensorsSendIntervalEffects} show
- that the transmission frequency has a very low impact
- on the energy consumption and on the cumulative end-to-end application delay. It has an impact of course, but it is very
- limited. This due to the fact that in such a scenario with very small number of communications
- spread over the time, sensors don't have to contend for accessing to the Wifi channel.
-
+ In a first place, we start by studying the impact of the sensors' transmission frequency on their
+ energy consumption. To this end, we run several simulations in ns3 with 15 sensors using
+ different transmission frequencies. The results provided by Table
+ \ref{tab:sensorsSendIntervalEffects} show that the transmission frequency has a very low impact
+ on the energy consumption and on the average end-to-end application delay. It has an impact of
+ course, but it is very limited. This due to the fact that in such a scenario with very small
+ number of communications spread over the time, sensors don't have to contend for accessing to the
+ Wifi channel.
+
#+BEGIN_EXPORT latex
% Please add the following required packages to your document preamble:
% \usepackage{booktabs}
@@ -431,10 +431,10 @@ In this section, we analyze the experimental results.
\label{tab:sensorsSendIntervalEffects}
\begin{tabular}{@{}lrrrrr@{}}
\toprule
- Sensors Send Interval & 10s & 30s & 50s & 70s & 90s \\ \midrule
+ Sensors Send Interval & 10s & 30s & 50s & 70s & 90s \\ \midrule
Sensors Power Consumption & 13.517\hl{94}W & 13.517\hl{67}W & 13.51767W & 13.51767W & 13.517\hl{61}W \\
Network Power Consumption & 10.441\hl{78}W & 10.441\hl{67}W & 10.44161W & 10.44161W & 10.441\hl{61}W \\
- Cumulative Application Delay & 17.81360s & 5.91265s & 3.53509s & 2.55086s & 1.93848s \\ \bottomrule
+ End-to-end Application Delay & 0.09951s & 0.10021s & 0.10100s & 0.10203s & 0.10202s \\ \bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table*}
#+END_EXPORT
@@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ applicability of our model.
-
+
*** Plot Scripts
**** Random R Scripts
@@ -864,11 +864,11 @@ applicability of our model.
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS:
- : [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
- : sensorsSendInterval 10.00000 30.00000 50.00000 70.00000 90.00000
- : sensorsEnergy 13.51794 13.51767 13.51767 13.51767 13.51761
- : networkEnergy 10.44178 10.44167 10.44161 10.44161 10.44161
- : avgDelay 17.81360 5.91265 3.53509 2.55086 1.93848
+ : [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5]
+ : sensorsSendInterval 10.0000000 30.000000 50.000000 70.000000 90.000000
+ : sensorsEnergy 13.5179444 13.517667 13.517667 13.517667 13.517611
+ : networkEnergy 10.4417825 10.441668 10.441612 10.441612 10.441612
+ : avgDelay 0.0995173 0.100214 0.101002 0.102034 0.102025